The Role of Multiple Representations and Attitudes in Enhancing Statistical and Mathematical Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22105/siot.vi.52Keywords:
Multiple representations, Student attitudes, Mathematical learning, Representational flexibility, Instructional strategies, Cognitive developmentAbstract
This research paper investigates how various representations and student attitudes can improve the learning of statistics and mathematics. The main issue examined is the challenges students encounter in understanding mathematical concepts due to insufficient representational flexibility and adverse attitudes toward their education. The study explores the impact of various representation modes—such as visual, symbolic, verbal, and numeric—on enhancing comprehension of intricate mathematical and statistical ideas. By combining theoretical analysis with case studies, the paper assesses teaching methods that incorporate these representations, emphasizing their effectiveness in boosting conceptual understanding and problem-solving capabilities. The methods employed include a thorough review of educational strategies that foster representational skills, an analysis of classroom practices, and an evaluation of student attitudes and feelings about mathematics. Key findings indicate that representational flexibility not only improves cognitive skills but also has a beneficial effect on students' motivation, self-confidence, and perseverance in their studies. The research also points out the challenges educators face when applying multi-representational teaching and proposes effective strategies to address these issues. The conclusions drawn from this research are significant, suggesting that nurturing representational skills and a growth mindset in students can greatly enhance their learning results in mathematics and statistics, leading to more creative and inclusive educational practices.
References
Chen, Y., Chai, K. K., Ma, L., Liu, C., & Zhang, T. (2024). Empowering university students with a guided personalised learning model [presentation]. 2024 ieee global engineering education conference (educon) (pp. 1–4). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON60312.2024.10578616
Lam, K.-H., Chan, C. S., Chan, W. K. V., Mark, K.-P., & Gatrell, D. (2022). Learning analytics to study the use of virtual tutorials for teaching university general educational subjects [presentation]. 2022 ieee international conference on teaching, assessment and learning for engineering (tale) (pp. 719–722). https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00126
Manasa, P. M., Khandelwal, P., Shah, Y., Jain, V., & Kataruka, K. (2024). Intelligent learning analytics through e-learning [presentation]. 2024 international conference on emerging technologies in computer science for interdisciplinary applications (icetcs) (pp. 1–4). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETCS61022.2024.10543572
Skar, G. B. U., Graham, S., & Huebner, A. (2022). Learning loss during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of emergency remote instruction on first grade students’ writing: A natural experiment. Journal of educational psychology, 114(7), 1553. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000701
Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. Springer Science & Business Media. https://books.google.com/books
Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational studies in mathematics, 61, 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z
Presmeg, N. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education, 205–235. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901127_009
Mohapatra, H., & Rath, A. K. (2020). Fault-tolerant mechanism for wireless sensor network. IET wireless sensor systems, 10(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-wss.2019.0106
Mohapatra, H., & Rath, A. K. (2021). A fault tolerant routing scheme for advanced metering infrastructure: an approach towards smart grid. Cluster computing, 24(3), 2193–2211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-021-03255-x
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
Barroso, C., Ganley, C. M., McGraw, A. L., Geer, E. A., Hart, S. A., & Daucourt, M. C. (2021). A meta-analysis of the relation between math anxiety and math achievement. Psychological bulletin, 147(2), 134. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/bul0000307